Life Network Australia
HOMEABOUT LNACOMPASSION TO ACTIONENEWSCONTACT US
INFORMATION
INSPIRATION
OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACTION
LET LNA HELP YOU
SUPPORT LNA

The Case Against Abortion

More controversy over mental health and abortion.

Life Network Australia - Sunday, April 14, 2013

Michael Cook (Bio Edge) have reported that "Another controversial review of the mental health risks of abortion has been published, this time in the peer-reviewed Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. The authors of “Does abortion reduce the mental health risks of unwanted or unintended pregnancy? A re-appraisal of the evidence” argue that abortion may be a mental health risk.
 
They contend that the evidence shows that abortion is not associated with a reduction in rates of mental health problems, and is associated with increases in risks of anxiety, alcohol and drug misuse, and suicidal behavior. They warn that “the growing evidence suggesting that abortion does not have therapeutic benefits cannot be ignored indefinitely, and it is unacceptable for clinicians to authorize large numbers of abortions on grounds for which there is, currently, no scientific evidence.” Read more here

Other research on the negative psychological impacts of abortion here .

Federal politicians ignore warning about RU486 - and now a woman has died.

Life Network Australia - Monday, March 19, 2012

Last May (2011), Life Network Australia reported the harm done by the RU486 abortion pill in South Australia, where some 400 women were hospitalised in just one year.

At the time, Dr. Mulligan said that "Australian doctors are on a learning curve" in the use of RU486.  Life Network Australia argued that they were playing with the lives of women and babies.

This article was sent to Nicola Roxon, former Federal Minister for Health and to Peter Dutton, Shadow Minister for Health. However our warnings were ignored and now a woman has died from what The Australian call a "bedroom abortion".

The Australian reports that the Therapeutic Goods Administration has "issued a notice to doctors and clinics to review their follow up care". Life Network Australia continues to argue that abortion does not qualify as "therapeutic" and should be taken out of their hands.

Life Network Australia again calls on Nicola Roxon to suspend access to the RU486 abortion pill - or women (not to mention the babies) will continue to die.

This tragic death follows that of another mother, just before Christmas - and a near fatality just weeks before that in Melbourne. For every baby it is a certain agonising death!

 "Legal, safe and rare"? ...no such thing!

 

Liberal MP speaks out in Vic Parliament in first week of sitting, 2012.

Life Network Australia - Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Victorian Liberal MP, Bernie Finn, has not wasted any time in highlighting the problem of abortion during the first week of Parliamentary sitting (on February 9, 2012). He provided a summary of the research conducted by Dr. Priscilla Coleman - which was recently published in the highly respected British Journal of Psychiatry (August, 2011).

Mr. Finn provided alarming statistics from this study, revealing the psychological risks of abortion to women and has asked the Minister for Mental Health, Mary Wooldridge, to establish post abortion counselling services in Victoria. 

There were no interjections made and Mr Finn said "You could have heard a pin drop! "

Read his address here:

"Mental health: abortion counselling services. 

Mr FINN (Western Metropolitan) — I have a  

matter for the attention of the Minister for Mental

Health. I draw the minister’s attention to an extensive

study by US university professor Priscilla Coleman,

which was published in the prestigious British Journal

of Psychiatry late last year. Professor Coleman

 performed a meta-analysis of 22 studies, which tracked

a total of 877 181 women, 163 831 of whom were post

abortive. This was clearly no small study and the results

were truly illuminating. My understanding is that it is

the largest study of its kind ever conducted in the world.

The results of this study are disturbing, but as I say they

are quite illuminating. The study found that women

with an abortion history experienced 81 per cent

increased risk of mental health problems. It found an

increased risk of anxiety disorders in the order of 34 per

cent, an increased risk of depression of 37 per cent, an

increased risk of alcohol use and abuse of 110 per cent

and an increased risk of marijuana use and abuse of

220 per cent. When compared to unintended

pregnancies that were delivered, women who

terminated had a 55 per cent increased risk of mental

health problems. Alarmingly nearly 10 per cent of all

mental health problems were found to be directly

attributable to abortion. These figures certainly shocked

me and I think they would shock most people,

particularly so when we realise that Australian women

were included in this study.

Given the results of this survey, it is clear that

considerable numbers of women here in Victoria may

be suffering at least some mental health problems

following abortions, particularly since 2008, because

the number of late-term abortions has skyrocketed since

that time following the passing of the Abortion Law

Reform Act 2008, which allows abortion in this state up

until birth. As a result of that, many women may need

assistance. Today I am asking the minister to provide

that assistance. I am convinced that post-abortion

counselling services are much needed in Victoria, and I

ask the minister to facilitate the provision of these

services to ease the burden felt by so many women

following their abortions".

Please support the courageous efforts of Bernie Finn by continuing to contact:

Premier Baillieu: http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/contact.html 

and

Victorian Health Minister, David Davis: http://www.vic.gov.au/contactsandservices/directory/?ea0_lfz99_120.&organizationalRole&b72724f2-1db2-4b9f-b226-7f05e1c8ad54

 

Vic Hansard link: ( http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/images/stories/daily-hansard/Council_2012/Council_Feb-Jun_2012_Daily_9_February_2012.pdf - pg 75)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The horrifying abortion of twin boys - just the tip of the iceberg.

Life Network Australia - Saturday, November 26, 2011

By Debbie Garratt, Real Choices Australia - Used with permission.

This week we watched in horror as the story of the tragic death of two baby boys at the royal women's hospital  unfolded.  We are rightly horrified.  A healthy, viable, loved baby has been deliberately killed and the parents and other family members will have to live with the loss and grief for the rest of their lives.  It is a tragedy. 

One aspect of this story that will not make the news is that had the 'correct' baby been terminated he would have been simply a number in the 2011 Perinatal Morbidity Statistics.  We wouldn't have heard about him or his family. 

Is it because the baby was healthy that we are outraged and it made the news headlines? No, it can't be that because every year healthy babies are aborted after 23 weeks of pregnancy.  The Perinatal Morbidity Statistics reveal that of 328 late term abortions in 2008, 178 of them were performed on healthy babies whose mothers were experiencing psychosocial problems.  So it isn't that the baby was healthy that we are outraged, otherwise we would be outraged for all of these babies and their mothers.

Is it that the baby was apparently 'wanted' then?  Perhaps not, as research tells us that more than 70% of women having abortions do so feeling as though they have no other choice.  This suggests that if the women were provided social and emotionally supportive alternatives they would have continued their pregnancies.   It wasn't their babies that were unwanted, but the circumstances they found themselves in. 

Perhaps it is that the tragedy of abortion on the lives of babies, women and families has become so great that we don't really want to believe it when we hear it.  When something like this situation occurs it's a collective and cumulative outrage for all mothers and babies that we express.   We should be outraged with a society that continues to allow women to be told that their medically determined 'less than perfect' children are better off not being born or that their social problems are best 'fixed' by the termination of their child.  

The messages we send women and girls about their 'right' to pregnancy and motherhood are outrageous.  Teen mums in Wagga Wagga have been told this month that they must choose between their children and an education,  that abortion would have been a 'better' choice for them.  Instead of looking for ways to support young mums to build a positive future full of opportunities, local services fuss about the lack of surgical termination options available locally.  

Instead of getting the support and encouragement to embrace and love their 'less than perfect' child, even if he only lived a short while, a couple have now lost both their children.  

We should be outraged, but let's be outraged on behalf of every mother not offered what she needs to be able to hold her baby in her arms rather than an ache in her heart for the rest of her life.





Executive Director


Real Choices Australia

Mother survives brush with death after late term abortion - Melbourne.

Life Network Australia - Sunday, October 23, 2011

Life Network Australia maintains that babies, women and families deserve "Better than abortion" (Feminists for Life).

The Age (Oct 23, 2011) have described how a late term abortion procedure almost claimed the life of Ms Pheap Sem: "Still unconscious, without pain relief or oxygen, with clear signs that her liver was not producing the proteins that would enable her blood to clot, and without any of her family or friends nearby, she underwent the abortion. Shortly afterwards, at 10.39am, clinic staff called an ambulance. But even then they only called for a ''Code 2'' pick-up - meaning ''not time critical'', so no lights and sirens". 

"Dr Schulberg had aborted Ms Sem's 23-week-old foetus, without anaesthetic, even though she was dangerously ill, unconscious and had no family present".

Read more here...

The Age states that "Single and unemployed, she (Ms Sem) felt she could not support a fifth child in her tiny two-bedroom flat".  In reading about her situation, another of FFL's catch phrases comes to mind.. that "Abortion is a reflection that the needs of women are not being met". Her situation and decision to abort also supports international research that reveals that the majority of women who undergo abortions feel they have no "choice". 

Sadly, the death of Ms Sem's 23 week old baby does not warrant even a mention in this article. It is wonderful that Ms Sem has miraculously survived this abortion procedure.

The Age reported that the doctor who performed the abortion of Ms Sem's baby has been under scrutiny before:  "In 2009, Dr Schulberg was found guilty in VCAT of serious unprofessional conduct for failing to obtain proper consent to perform an abortion on an intellectually disabled woman who was raped by her father". 

PS: Life Network Australia is interested to know if, given the change in Victorian abortion legislation, the previous case against Dr Schulberg would be possible today - given that parental consent is no longer required.   






Research reveals eighty one percent increased risk mental health problems post abortion.

Life Network Australia - Friday, September 16, 2011

Used with permission - Real Choices Australia.

Latest research confirms links between abortion and increased mental health problems in women.

According to a new study published in the highly regarded British Journal of Psychiatry, women who had undergone an abortion experienced an 81% increased risk of mental health problems.   This study was a meta-analysis of 22 studies published between 1995 and 2009 involving almost 900,000 women across six countries.    Research which combines and examines the results of a number of other methodologically sound studies are far more reliable than any single study alone because of the wealth of data available.

The results of these combined studies reveal higher rates of anxiety related disorders (34%), depression (37%), alcohol use/abuse (110%), marijuana use (230%), and higher rates of suicidal behaviour (155%).

When comparing women who had abortions with women who delivered after an unintended pregnancy, those having abortions had an overall increased risk of 55% for experiencing any mental health problem.

The study was carried out by Dr Priscilla Coleman, a Professor of Human Development and Family Studies at Bowling Green State University in Ohio.  Dr Coleman is one of the foremost researchers in the field of abortion and mental health.

Of particular interest is the finding that almost 10% of the incidence of all mental health problems in the community has been shown to be directly attributable to abortion.   Given the millions of dollars expended on mental health initiatives in this country, this figure is very significant and of economic concern.

If the medical community apply the same evidence based approach to the provision of abortion services as any other medical or surgical service, this information should be incorporated into the practise of informed consent processes in order for women to make fully informed health care decisions.

Real Choices Australia believes that abortion is inherently harmful to women.  More than 94% of women considering abortion do so in the absence of real choice.   They also do so in the absence of full disclosure of all the potential negative outcomes.   Abortion is coercive when it is presented as the only option to a woman’s circumstances. Without real and adequate support to continue a pregnancy, there is no choice.

Coleman, P. (2011) Abortion and mental health: quantitative synthesis and analysis of research published 1995-2009.   The British Journal of Psychiatry 199, 180-186

 

Eighty one percent increased risk mental health problems post abortion

Life Network Australia - Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Used with permission - Real Choices Australia.

Latest research confirms links between abortion and increased mental health problems in women.

According to a new study published in the highly regarded British Journal of Psychiatry, women who had undergone an abortion experienced an 81% increased risk of mental health problems.   This study was a meta-analysis of 22 studies published between 1995 and 2009 involving almost 900,000 women across six countries.    Research which combines and examines the results of a number of other methodologically sound studies are far more reliable than any single study alone because of the wealth of data available.

The results of these combined studies reveal higher rates of anxiety related disorders (34%), depression (37%), alcohol use/abuse (110%), marijuana use (230%), and higher rates of suicidal behaviour (155%).

When comparing women who had abortions with women who delivered after an unintended pregnancy, those having abortions had an overall increased risk of 55% for experiencing any mental health problem.

The study was carried out by Dr Priscilla Coleman, a Professor of Human Development and Family Studies at Bowling Green State University in Ohio.  Dr Coleman is one of the foremost researchers in the field of abortion and mental health.

Of particular interest is the finding that almost 10% of the incidence of all mental health problems in the community has been shown to be directly attributable to abortion.   Given the millions of dollars expended on mental health initiatives in this country, this figure is very significant and of economic concern.

If the medical community apply the same evidence based approach to the provision of abortion services as any other medical or surgical service, this information should be incorporated into the practise of informed consent processes in order for women to make fully informed health care decisions.

Real Choices Australia believes that abortion is inherently harmful to women.  More than 94% of women considering abortion do so in the absence of real choice.   They also do so in the absence of full disclosure of all the potential negative outcomes.   Abortion is coercive when it is presented as the only option to a woman’s circumstances. Without real and adequate support to continue a pregnancy, there is no choice.

Coleman, P. (2011) Abortion and mental health: quantitative synthesis and analysis of research published 1995-2009.   The British Journal of Psychiatry 199, 180-186

 

Late term abortion patient in critical condition - Melbourne.

Life Network Australia - Sunday, August 28, 2011
Late Line reported that a woman is in a critical condition in Box Hill (Melbourne), following a late term abortion of her 24 week old unborn baby. The patient is in intensive care after experiencing organ failure.

According to the report, the owner and physician of the clinic, Dr. Mark Schulberg, who is known as "Australia's late term abortion specialist", has faced the Medical Board of Australia. He told Late Line that "the patient had a serious previous existing condition and that the abortion had nothing to do with her current state of health. "
Late Line also revealed that it was at Dr. Schulberg's clinic that an anaethetist allegedly infected some 40 patients with Hepatitis C, between 2008 and 2009.

Pro life organisations argue that abortion hurts women, and although it is the most common female procedure, it is also the most under-regulated. The current abortion legislation does not require physicians, such as Dr. Schulberg, to warn of such risks to women, nor is there any requirement to explain just what the procedure entails.

Well known for her support of abortion, Dr. Caroline De Costa conceded that late term procedures are risky, with the possibility of hemorrhaging, admission to hospital and the requirement of pain relief. Dr. De Costa also said that late term abortions are done because of a "Diagnosis of a severe abnormality in the child, often incompatible with life or incompatible with the quality of life that is acceptable to the parents" and "sometimes because the mother has developed a medical condition during pregnancy, which is being exacerbated by the pregnancy continuing. It is usually done for a major medical indication".

In defending the practice, some doctors argue that these are rare cases and usually done for extreme abnormalities. Doctor Lachlan De Crespigny also made these claims, but they were shown by a Victorian Health Department Report to be inaccurate - the report revealed that over half of the babies aborted late term were in fact, healthy babies. The most recent Victorian Health Department report (2008) reveals that some 178 of the 328 late term abortions were performed for 'psycho social' reasons - see information following this article. 

It is alarming that doctors appear to be more willing to expose women to the risks of late term abortion, rather than referring women for support. Many of us, including those with disabilities, take exception to the notion that a babies life is measured by the "quality of life acceptable to the parents". Dr. De Costa has effectively admitted that the practice of eugenics is 'alive and well' in Australia. 

For babies who are "incompatible with life", it seems bizarre that doctors would add the trauma of a barbaric abortion procedure, to a baby who is already terminal and to his/ her parents.

It is questionable just what "Medical conditions exacerbated during pregnancy" warrant an abortion? 
Surely excellent medical care (and practical support) for the mother and the baby (rather than abortion) is a priority? 
 A young pregnant friend attended a hospital in Melbourne for extreme morning sickness, but eventually had an abortion. She was informed by her doctor that if she wanted to have another baby, she should get private medical cover to receive the care she needed.
This statement by Dr. De Costa (and the experience of my friend) raises serious questions about abortion being offered as second rate 'treatment' for medical conditions.

The greatest injustice of this whole tragic situation is that in this instance it is possible that there will be two fatalities. The twenty four week old baby, like all other late term babies who are aborted, endured two days of excruciating pain (no anaesthetic required by Victorian law). While Victorian law recognises the rights of the mother - who is receiving excellent hospital care, her dead baby remains ignored by law, discarded by our society and another victim of our violent abortion industry.
 
 While refusing to go into the details of the case, Victorian Health Minister, David Davis stated that the public would be concerned. Surely the public has the right to know the grizzly details of such horrific late term abortion procedures, which have increased by 600% at the Royal Women's Hospital in Melbourne (since the Victorian abortion law reform in 2008), with staff reportedly traumatised.

A doctor friend described role playing as part of her medical training some years ago. The assignment was to warn a patient of the risks of any procedure. She began to describe the many possible and serious side affects of an abortion procedure - she was abruptly interrupted by her mentor and advised that "You do not warn of the risks of abortion".

 Dr. David Grundman was interviewed some years ago on 60 Minutes and refused to describe a late term abortion procedure to the public. Surely, with one mother's life in the balance - and yet another dead baby, the media will now describe just what this procedure entails.

Late Line stated that "The Medical Board of Australia is investigating the case and is yet to reach a conclusion." Life Network Australia concludes that abortion continues to hurt babies, women and families.

Related Information:
The Herald Sun (Aug 26, 2011) reported that
- " The Consultative Council on Obstetric and Paediatric Mortality and Morbidity 2008 annual report released last week shows there were 328 late term abortions that year, 178 of which were performed on women  for ''psychosocial'' reasons.

- "The other abortions were performed because of congenital abnormalities. "

- "Sixty-five of the psychosocial abortions were performed on women under 20 years of age."

- "One hundred and eight women who had psychosocial abortions travelled from interstate or overseas, where few doctors are willing to perform the procedure."

- "At least two of the psychosocial abortions were performed on women more than 7 months pregnant."

- "The figures were slightly down on 2007, which recorded 345 late term abortions, 164 for psychosocial reasons".
(This last statistic seems inconsistent with Channel Seven's Report of the 600% increase in late term abortions at the Royal Women's Hospital in Melbourne).

Distress After Abortion Linked to Increased Mental Health Problems

Life Network Australia - Sunday, November 08, 2009

New Findings Indicate 85 Percent of Women Have Negative Reactions After Abortion

Springfield, IL (Nov. 8, 2009) -- A new study on mental health problems after abortion has found that 85 percent of women reported negative reactions to abortion, putting them at higher risk for mental health problems.

The paper, published in the British Journal of Psychiatry, found that more than 85 percent of women who aborted reported at least one negative reaction to abortion, such as such as sorrow, grief, regret or disappointment; and approximately 35 percent reported five or more negative reactions. 

The high numbers are of concern because the paper also found that the risk of mental disorders among women who had negative reactions to abortion was 40 to 80 percent higher than among women who didn't abort.

The results came from an ongoing survey that tracked women in the Christchurch area of New Zealand from birth to age 30. A subsample of about 530 women were given questions about their pregnancy history and mental health outcomes, including being asked whether the pregnancy was unwanted or unplanned, and their initial reaction to the pregnancy at the time.

Overall, more than 86 percent of women who had abortions also reported at least one positive reaction, such as feelings of relief, happiness or satisfaction. When the responses are broken down into categories, however, more women were likely to respond "not at all" when asked if they felt happiness (58 percent "not at all" vs. 23 percent "very much") or satisfaction (60 percent vs. 20 percent) about the abortion.

The research team concluded that "many women experience a mixture of both positive and negative emotions about having an abortion," but said that that the results don't support the belief that abortion is better for women than unwanted or unplanned pregnancy. 

"There is no evidence in this research that would suggest that unwanted pregnancies that come to term were associated with increased risks of mental health problems or that abortion mitigated the risks of mental health problems in women having unwanted pregnancy," the authors noted.

 
New Study Supports Previous Findings on Mental Health and Abortion

The latest findings follow two other studies led by the same researcher that also linked abortion to higher rates of mental health problems.

In 2005, they published findings showing that young women who had abortions subsequently experienced higher rates of suicidal behaviors, depression, substance abuse, anxiety and other mental health problems.

A second study in 2008 found that women were 30 percent more likely to experience mental health disorders after abortion than they were for other pregnancy outcomes. As with the current paper, this study found that women who continued an unwanted or mistimed pregnancy did not experience a significant increase in mental health problems--challenging arguments from abortion advocates that abortion is better for women than carrying an "unwanted" pregnancy to term.

 

Abortion Not As Safe as Presented, Authors Say

In the 2005 paper, the authors were critical of the American Psychological Association's claim that abortion does not pose mental health risks for most women. The study's lead author, Prof. David Fergusson, who has described himself as pro-choice, has been an outspoken critic of the APA and has called for more research into the safety of abortion.

Last year, Fergusson published an editorial supporting the position of the Royal College of Psychiatrists in the U.K., which said that the evidence suggests that abortion can increase mental health problems for some women. He also criticized a report by an APA task force that dismissed research linking abortion and mental health problems and which claimed that abortion is generally safe for most women. Read More

Besides the 85 percent of women reporting negative reactions in this study, other evidence suggests that many women do, in fact, find this experience distressing.

survey of American women who had abortions found that more than half said they felt rushed or uncertain about abortion and 64 percent reported feeling pressured by others to abort. Sixty-five percent of the survey respondents reported symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder that they attributed to their abortions, with slightly over 14 percent reporting all the symptoms for a diagnosis of PTSD.

Further, the evidence points to the need for health care providers and abortionists to screen women and girls for coercion and other known, statistically-validated factors that put them at risk for mental health problems after abortion. Such screening would help put an end to abortions that are unwanted, unsafe and unnecessary and would help protect the rights of both women and their unborn children.

The Legal Implications and Real Help for Women in NeedRead More

Visit the Elliot Institute's model bill to hold abortionists liable for failing to screen for coercion and psychological risk factors before abortion here.

Source: David M. Ferugsson, L. John Horwood and Joseph M. Boden, "Reactions to abortion and subsequent mental health," The British Journal of Psychiatry 195: 420-426 (2009).

 Contact: amy@afterabortion.info

Reproduced with permission.
 


Recent Posts


Tags


Archive